![]() |
New & Improved Anti-Detect - Printable Version +- Blizzard Sector (https://www.blizzsector.co) +-- Forum: General Community (https://www.blizzsector.co/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: Small Talk (https://www.blizzsector.co/forum-11.html) +--- Thread: New & Improved Anti-Detect (/thread-8312.html) |
New & Improved Anti-Detect - Sindercat - 08-20-2004 icesage Wrote:Darawk, and Teferi, and I have been working on a new anti-detect for the last few weeks. While many people seem to think JHJ's anti-detect works, it really doesn't do much at all. JHJ's anti-detect does a very sloppy job of spoofing 0x64 packet, which is just as suspicious as sending a not having his anti-detect loaded at all. Darawk and I got together and decided that we should create an anti-detect that spoofs the 0x64 packet correctly to keep you from easily being detected. Original post - http://www.blizzhackers.com/viewtopic.php?t=194183&start=0 This anti-detect is very useful and works like a treat, I have been using it for a few days now, it's protected me from a few drophacks. Also the blocking of unknown/unused packets that tag you as a hacker when sent is a very useful part of the code. I have sent numerous packets which log you as a hacker without knowing before :\ New & Improved Anti-Detect - Bowbow - 08-20-2004 Is there Anti Detect . dll? Since for Jhj users we have to place it in our directory w/o d2hackit. New & Improved Anti-Detect - Sindercat - 08-20-2004 JHJ uses d2hackit, check in the folder and just edit d2hackit.ini in the JHJ folder New & Improved Anti-Detect - reptromiki - 08-20-2004 Ive heard its better to not have an anti-detect then it is to have one since using an anti-detect you have a better chance of being caught. New & Improved Anti-Detect - Sindercat - 08-21-2004 Yes that was the old anti-detect. What basiclly happens it, if your in a game and you have a 'hack' loaded, well the hack changes certain memory space within D2, blizzard from time to time randomly send you a packet, if you have a hack loaded, the packet sent back informs blizzard that you are using one and you are 'tagged'. The old anti-detect either blocked the packet, or sent back a faulty one (from what I hear) but this version actually sends a reply as if you didn't have a hack loaded, thus you don't get tagged. Also the extra features such drophack protection and the blocking of certain unknown/unused packets that tag you as a hacker is a great bonus. |