Page 1 of 8 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 155
  1. #1

    Default Computer Showoff Thread

    Hello guys, come here and show off your comp specs! Heres mine:

    -Intel P4 DualCore Processors
    -3.0GHZ, both processors
    -Dual-Channel DDR2 512 SDRAM PC3200
    -ATI RADEON X1300 512MB VIDEO CARD!
    -80GB Hard Drive
    -17" Flatscreen Monitor
    -2.1 Speakers(Stereo)
    -1 DVD/CD Rom
    -Win XP Pro
    -DSL Internet

    I'm upgrading RAM soon. My bro probably gonna get a job soon and hes gonna practically build a new computer. Lets see what kinds of comps you guys have!

  2. #2
    Uber Noobling jedimaster86's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Battle Tag
    None
    Posts
    4,593

    Default

    -Dell Inspiron 6000 Laptop (pretty popular for college, pretty good for multimedia and stuff)
    -Intel Pentium M Processor, 2.0GHz
    -70.5 GB Hard Drive (i thought it was actually 80 GB, dunno)
    -128MB DDR ATI's MOBILITY RADEON X300 PCI Express x16 Graphics (at least this, not sure)
    -5.4" Monitor
    -1 DVD/CD Rom
    -Windows XP
    -T1 Internet (if connected through college)

  3. #3
    GFX Freak And ***** FrogMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    2,466

    Default

    Ordered this pc for myself

    Socket 939 AMD dual core 4800+
    2 gig ram(still waiting to find the amd board that can support ddr2)
    2 400gig sata drives(felt like going overboard)
    1 dvd dual writer
    7800 gtx 512mb(my baby)


    Please vote for us, it takes you 5 seconds.

  4. #4
    Hooker with a Pen!s
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    West Des Moines, Iowa
    Posts
    3,324

    Default

    Intel Pentium 4 w/ HT S-478 @ 3 GHz
    1 gig of PC3200 RAM in dual channel
    eVGA 6600GT
    Creative Live! 24 bit sound card
    3x CD burners, 1x DVD burner
    160 GB hard drive, getting a 250 soon.
    Both my GPU and my CPU have non-stock heatsink and fans.

    As soon as I buy the parts for my parent's computer I'm upgrading to 2x 1 gig stick of Corsair XMS RAM so I can finally overclock again. And I'm also upgrading to a socket T P4 with 64 bit tech so I can run Vista smooth.

    Also, you wasted your money on an Intel dual core processor. Intel's dual core processor technology sucks bawlz. AMD is way better for dual core stuff.

  5. #5
    President of the Republic Mathalamus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    calgary
    Posts
    3,232

    Default

    my computer is
    windows XP home edition
    70 gigabyte hardrive (its sopposed to be 80 damn it!)
    dunno what vidio card lol
    somewhere between 1.5 to 3.8 GHZ


    coming soon
    and extra portable drive of 50 gigabytes

    President of the Mathalamus Republic, Representative of Insane Creative people.
    Alignment: True Neutral

  6. #6
    Hooker with a Pen!s
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    West Des Moines, Iowa
    Posts
    3,324

    Default

    1.5 to 3.8... That's a pretty big spread.

  7. #7
    The Immortals Dan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    1,541

    Default

    wasnt there a thread about this earlier? eh whatever
    Pentium D 840 dual core EE runnin at 3.6ghz
    4gb ddr2 ram
    500 gb Harddrive (going to upgrade to 1TB soon)
    ATI x850 Platinum PCI graphics card (eww)
    auidgy sound card
    5 channel surround sound
    30 in Dell Ultrasharp flatpannel LCD monitor
    256k DSL (lol)
    one DVD burner/player
    one CD player/writer

    going to upgrade hard drive size and graphics card soon, i want to get what frogman has the 7800 GTX 512 mb.....ATI sucks

  8. #8
    Hooker with a Pen!s
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    West Des Moines, Iowa
    Posts
    3,324

    Default

    You people are morons for buying Intel dual core processors. Waste of money. Little overkill on the RAM, Dustoid? And your sound card sucks, too. But damn... I want your memory...

  9. #9

    Default

    Guys, as far as I know isn't Pentium 4 like the best? Whats up with Pentium D and AMD Athlon shit?

  10. #10
    Hooker with a Pen!s
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    West Des Moines, Iowa
    Posts
    3,324

    Default

    No, AMD is better than Intel, currently. P4's are no where near as efficient as Athlons. And the Pentium D is a joke compared to the FX-2 series from AMD.

    I still use Intel because I use my computer for multimedia more than gaming.

  11. #11
    Founder Luke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Australia
    Battle Tag
    Spitfire#1983
    Posts
    4,504
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    AMD Is currently Killing Intel. For Example you will find most web servers are moving away from the Dual Xeon to the new Dual Core AMD's.

    ================================================== =====
    AMD Opterons are blowing away P4 Xeons by a mile in performance and in performance to cost ratios!

    Examples

    http://www.gamepc.com/labs/view_cont...axville&page=9

    50,000 user apache concurrency test

    Intel Dual P4 3.0GHZ Xeon = 1043.7
    Intel Dual P4 3.2GHZ Xeon = 1106.1
    Intel Dual P4 3.4GHZ Xeon = 1155.6
    Intel Dual P4 3.6GHZ Xeon = 1215.3
    AMD Dual Opteron 248 = 1345.9
    AMD Dual Opteron 250 = 1389.4
    AMD Dual Opteron 252 = 1426.0
    AMD Dual Opteron 265 dual core = 1587.3
    AMD Dual Opteron 270 dual core = 1778.7
    AMD Dual Opteron 275 dual core = 1874.6

    http://www.gamepc.com/labs/view_cont...ron275&page=10

    50,000 user apache concurrency test

    Intel dual core 2.4ghz Xeon = 1099.8
    Intel dual core 2.6ghz Xeon = 1171.3
    Intel dual core 2.8ghz Xeon = 1199.4
    AMD Dual Opteron 265 dual core = 1510.1
    AMD Dual Opteron 270 dual core = 1686.6
    AMD Dual Opteron 275 dual core = 1722.2
    AMD Dual Opteron 280 dual core = 1968.2

    Looking to compile some MySQL concurrency numbers but it's hard to find comparable reviews but Opterons show as much if not more improvement in mysql as in above apache concurrency tests

    Amazing difference!

    Check out pricewatch prices as at Dec 3, 2005 http://www.pricewatch.com/m-3.htm

    $570 - xeon 3.6ghz 604
    $395 - xeon 3.4ghz 604
    $429 - xeon 3.4ghz 2mb 800
    $245 - xeon 3.2ghz 800
    $479 - xeon 3.2ghz 533
    $262 - xeon 3.2ghz 2mb 800
    $215 - xeon 3.0ghz 800
    $355 - xeon 3.0ghz 533
    $355 - xeon 3.0ghz 533
    $186 - xeon 2.8ghz 800

    vs

    $1260 - opteron 280 2.4ghz
    $1039 - opteron 275
    $845 - opteron 270
    $680 - opteron 265
    $825 - opteron 254
    $669 - opteron 252 -> better off with dual opteron 265 dual core cpus (4 physical cpus)
    $441 - opteron 250
    $275 - opteron 248 -> dual opteron 248 already kills dual P4 3.6ghz xeon cpus!
    $219 - opteron 246
    $174 - opteron 244

    Seems price to performance a dual opteron 248 or 250 server would be enough to kill dual P4 3.6ghz xeon cpus for apache and mysql tasks.

    ================================================== =


    I think we should decide on a program that shows all the info such as ram, cpu, vid card etc and post screen shots to prove that people have what they say they do. With blizzsec open in the background
    .

  12. #12
    Hooker with a Pen!s
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    West Des Moines, Iowa
    Posts
    3,324

    Default

    Everest.



    Last edited by Tool; 04-02-2006 at 01:01 PM.

  13. #13
    You would kill for this, just a little bit Tap's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Southern Illinois
    Battle Tag
    None
    Posts
    1,854

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tool
    I I'm also upgrading to a socket T P4 with 64 bit tech so I can run Vista smooth.
    lol if the fugger ever comes out
    You said so much without ever parting your lips.


  14. #14
    The Immortals Dan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    1,541

    Default

    i know intels dual core is crappy tech, but they can use duct tape to hold 2 processors together, i wouldn't care. i never liked AMD after they ****ed me over. and my graphics card sucks but its way better than yours its almost the same as a 6800 nvidia
    i'll take some screnies of my system soon
    Last edited by Dan; 04-03-2006 at 08:36 PM.

  15. #15
    GFX Freak And ***** FrogMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    2,466

    Default

    My last intel was a 166mhz mmx.. then i switched to amd 333 k6 and never looked back


    Please vote for us, it takes you 5 seconds.

  16. #16
    The Immortals Dan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    1,541

    Default

    http://s74.photobucket.com/albums/i2...slideshow=true

    i doubt it will work but i tried, if that dont show up good enough i'll do them seperatly on imageshack, not enough time to do that right now

  17. #17
    Hooker with a Pen!s
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    West Des Moines, Iowa
    Posts
    3,324

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.RuthMN-Dustoid4
    i know intels dual core is crappy tech, but they can use duct tape to hold 2 processors together, i wouldn't care. i never liked AMD after they ****ed me over. and my graphics card sucks but its way better than yours its almost the same as a 6800 nvidia
    i'll take some screnies of my system soon
    I said sound card.

    And the 6800 isn't much of a boost from the 6600. The only BIG difference is the size of video RAM it gives you. Clock speeds aren't that muh higher.

  18. #18
    The Immortals Dan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    1,541

    Default

    here are the pics of my system specs from pc wizzard 2006, i had to resize so i would be able to upload them, if u think they are fake in any way pm me with your email and i'll send u the full size pics, and a copy of the invoice

    processor:
    Attachment 1256
    motherboard:
    Attachment 1257
    graphics:

    memory:

    overview of my system:
    Last edited by Dan; 02-24-2007 at 01:27 AM.

  19. #19
    Hooker with a Pen!s
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    West Des Moines, Iowa
    Posts
    3,324

    Default

    You said your CPU was at 3.6 GHz. =\

  20. #20
    The Immortals Dan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    1,541

    Default

    dell lets u OC it up to 3.6ghz with just choosing an option in the BIOS, since i am only playin d2 and some other crappy old games i do not need the extra speed, plus with the bot running all night it makes my parents nervous with the heat it generates so i only have it that fast when i need it to be

Page 1 of 8 123 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 11 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 11 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •