Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 43
  1. #21
    You would kill for this, just a little bit Tap's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Southern Illinois
    Battle Tag
    None
    Posts
    1,854

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BewarethePhoenix View Post
    Tap is considered acceptable in Zeal vs Zeal duels.
    Im always accepted..no matter what i do haha

    Anyways considering this is a tourney involving this site. feel free to write up your own set of rules then we can combine them in his orginal post. Dlihc wants this to be as Gm melee vs melee duels as possible.
    You said so much without ever parting your lips.


  2. #22
    Veteran Ael.Sys666-D)A('s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Central Pennsylvania
    Posts
    142

    Default

    I've seen purists go as far as saying No torches, Ravens, and Forts as well..

  3. #23
    You would kill for this, just a little bit Tap's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Southern Illinois
    Battle Tag
    None
    Posts
    1,854

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ael.Sys666-D)A( View Post
    I've seen purists go as far as saying No torches, Ravens, and Forts as well..

    ya stuff like that is definatly dumb.
    torches,ravens and forts will be allowed
    You said so much without ever parting your lips.


  4. #24
    Forum Member laucht's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Lambton,NSW,Australia
    Posts
    38

    Default

    u bet ur sweet ass thats dumb lol we're definetely not going that far dw all that will be allowed but i think no tapping against barbs or druids thats all
    I-laucht-I

  5. #25
    Too Noob To Be True Blue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Amittyville
    Battle Tag
    Blue#1471
    Posts
    3,709

    Default

    I just stopped by to look, and I'm wondering why no tap is allowed? When someone is building their melee character, the biggest thoughts in their head is life and retaining life. A character may rely heavily on that life tap/leach in duels to gain the upper hand.

    I think everything should be allowed except spells and bows. Basically any range attack is bad.

  6. #26
    Forum Member laucht's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Lambton,NSW,Australia
    Posts
    38

    Default

    lol man tap is allowed but only on others chars that use tap things aswell
    I-laucht-I

  7. #27
    ***** Elder BewarethePhoenix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Illinois
    Battle Tag
    phoenixskank#1598
    Posts
    595

    Default

    O.K. Tap the forum guy is not BM and hence allowed =) Only gear that is really not GM is Grief and ethereal Fort.

  8. #28
    Forum Member dLihc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Posts
    68

    Default

    so are you guys just gunna keep asking questions? where are the god damn melee chars.

    I've seen purists go as far as saying No torches, Ravens, and Forts as well..

    ive seen ppl say no death and andy or anything causeing ele dmg but yes iso more melee chars

    Zealot / Cest / *dLihc2 / dLihc

    Zealer / Zeal-Z / *buttafucco / laucht
    Conc Barb / SMACKa***** / *blizcanblome3 /BewareThePhoenix


    3 more at 8 i will put in some more detailed rules but thanks for all the info guys
    Last edited by dLihc; 03-17-2008 at 03:08 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost

    Brace Yourself

  9. #29
    You would kill for this, just a little bit Tap's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Southern Illinois
    Battle Tag
    None
    Posts
    1,854

    Default

    why exactly is Eth fort bm?
    You said so much without ever parting your lips.


  10. #30
    Forum Member dLihc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Posts
    68

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tap View Post
    why exactly is Eth fort bm?
    it shouldnt be but its kinda gay since adds mass dmg life and it would add way to much def so... yea its not allwed eth prudence is enuff

    Brace Yourself

  11. #31
    Forum Member laucht's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Lambton,NSW,Australia
    Posts
    38

    Default

    kk good we know the rules now all we need r the chars and oh Cest my new zealer now has eth prudence is that ok?
    I-laucht-I

  12. #32
    Forum Member dLihc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Posts
    68

    Default

    as of now imma allow eth fort and eth prudence unless there is mass complaints, if they wanna give up the dr for the def thats fine...

    Zealot / Cest / *dLihc2 / dLihc

    Zealer / Zeal-factor / *buttafucco / laucht

    Conc Barb / SMACKa***** / *blizcanblome3 /BewareThePhoenix

    Brace Yourself

  13. #33
    Forum Member laucht's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Lambton,NSW,Australia
    Posts
    38

    Default

    yay ty Cest oi is high defence like over 60k better than max dr? or does dr when it gets to 50% like double?
    I-laucht-I

  14. #34
    Forum Member dLihc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Posts
    68

    Default

    nick i have no idea what your asking... but i think dr > 60k def yes

    also... only way to get max dr with out a levi or shaft would be ss and if your using eth fort then other person can use exile so no complaining (imo tap>60kdef yes)
    Last edited by dLihc; 03-18-2008 at 03:24 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost

    Brace Yourself

  15. #35

    Default

    count me in
    kpa2/Socialism or last-try/paranoidAndroid

    simple rules imo: no tap vs non-tap chars(conc/fury, etc)
    no eth breakables(e fort/pul'd e temp's or w/e you can think of)
    say go, no potting, no angling, and other self-explanatory gm dueling rules apply ofc

    death is not considered bm on ladder

  16. #36
    ***** Elder BewarethePhoenix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Illinois
    Battle Tag
    phoenixskank#1598
    Posts
    595

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by socialism View Post
    count me in
    kpa2/Socialism or last-try/paranoidAndroid

    simple rules imo: no tap vs non-tap chars(conc/fury, etc)
    no eth breakables(e fort/pul'd e temp's or w/e you can think of)
    say go, no potting, no angling, and other self-explanatory gm dueling rules apply ofc

    death is not considered bm on ladder

    Sounds like a plan to me.

    And blast you Socialism! That Phoenix shield of yours kicks my ass! Oh well, at least it should be interesting to see how this goes...

  17. #37

    Default

    i'm not using phoenix vs barbs, it's my super-secret
    unique shield that you hate so much

  18. #38
    Forum Member laucht's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Lambton,NSW,Australia
    Posts
    38

    Default

    let me guess its alma negra isnt it socialism ^^? lol
    I-laucht-I

  19. #39
    Forum Member dLihc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Posts
    68

    Default

    Zealot / Cest / *dLihc2 / dLihc

    Zealer / Zeal-factor / *buttafucco / laucht

    Conc Barb / SMACKa***** / *blizcanblome3 /BewareThePhoenix

    kpa2/Socialism or last-try/paranoidAndroid

    got 4 iso 8 =P

    Brace Yourself

  20. #40
    ***** Elder BewarethePhoenix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Illinois
    Battle Tag
    phoenixskank#1598
    Posts
    595

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by socialism View Post
    i'm not using phoenix vs barbs, it's my super-secret
    unique shield that you hate so much

    Ah, that's good news for me. That Phoenix setup hurts like a sonofa*****...

    Come on now, any other melee dueling people here? Blizzsector don't fail me now!

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 7 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 7 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •