Posts: 1,991
Threads: 30
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation:
0
10-21-2005, 05:42 AM
(This post was last modified: 10-21-2005, 05:44 AM by TroGdoR.)
The advantage Osama bin Laden has over Saddam, toilet, is that he is not a man of one country. Everyone knew where Saddam resided, considering his palace was about as big as 30 football fields. And everyone knew that he was hiding somewhere in the Sunni triangle when he was found.
Osama bin Laden is constantly on the move...and he is in a country, Pakistan, that has not allowed the U.S. to start a major manhunt of its own. The U.S. currently is respecting the national sovereignty of Pakistan, and therefore will not play a MAJOR role in chasing him. But we do have men, mostly secret agents of the Delta Force, who are on his tail at all times. We've had a few close calls.
Back to the main point of this thread. That man will do everything in his power to delay this trial. He already has it off until late November. Don't be shocked if this isn't completed any time in the near future. In the end, I hope he is given the death penalty, because it is Iraq's Court Justice System that gets to decide his fate...not the U.S. like some of you think.
Posts: 3,722
Threads: 177
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation:
0
YIPES!
Sorry about that trog
Posts: 2,420
Threads: 161
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
0
Yes trogdor hit on the button there, and saddam is on trial in IRAQ, who will probably give him the death penalty but not before a long drawn out trial, because at the moment he is acting insane and dilusional to delay the courts by saying his still the president and that he does'nt recgonise the courts power.
Please vote for us, it takes you 5 seconds.
Posts: 1,515
Threads: 75
Joined: Jan 2005
Reputation:
0
They've got a long list of things he's being tried for. And if he's found guilty on even 1 of them, death sentence.
Posts: 318
Threads: 50
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation:
0
ok, the reason we havent killed him yet is because he needs a fair trial, we have to show Iraq how Democracy works, if we were to just kill him with no trial, then we would not be giving him his right to a fair trial and if Iraq sees this, they will end up where they are no with some other dictator. The reason there was a WWII was becasue after the first war, we left Germany in ruin and along came hitlet to lead an already screwed up nation, they needed to look to someone and that was hitler and bam, another war. If we kill sadam, then Iraq will learn nothing from this whole thing. We have to get a system going for them until they can establish their own government.
Posts: 438
Threads: 29
Joined: Jan 2005
Reputation:
0
Koolaid_dude Wrote:ok, the reason we havent killed him yet is because he needs a fair trial, we have to show Iraq how Democracy works, if we were to just kill him with no trial, then we would not be giving him his right to a fair trial and if Iraq sees this, they will end up where they are no with some other dictator. The reason there was a WWII was becasue after the first war, we left Germany in ruin and along came hitlet to lead an already screwed up nation, they needed to look to someone and that was hitler and bam, another war. If we kill sadam, then Iraq will learn nothing from this whole thing. We have to get a system going for them until they can establish their own government.
oh **** iraq, i think we need to just wipe out every terrorist and kill any civilian that resists, we need to start getting savage with these ****ers, its the only way the terrorism bullshit will stop.mad:
Posts: 2,812
Threads: 44
Joined: Jan 2005
Reputation:
0
[quote=SDSnyper]personally i think they should take him around back and put a 5.56 in him then slice his body up and ship a piece to every country that hes ever commited crimes against.[quote]
what is george bush gonna do when he finds saddam's balls in the mail?
or will he get Saddam's "weapon of mass destruction"
haha
Posts: 1,596
Threads: 71
Joined: Jan 2005
Reputation:
0
DCM, just because we haven't found Saddam's WMDs doesn't mean that he didn't HAVE them. During the Gulf War, Saddam destroyed practically all the chemical weapons he had. Unfortunately, the Americans were stationed downwind of the facilities that were doing the destroying, and some say that the inhalation of the fumes and such attributed to "Gulf War Syndrome."
I'm a firm believer that Iraq did, indeed, have WMD's, but they were actually clever about them, hiding them well or destroying them completely. Iraq's had a past of distracting surveyors from the UN and such long enough to get whatever was in some facilities out.
Posts: 2,812
Threads: 44
Joined: Jan 2005
Reputation:
0
and i never said i didnt believe you
i believe bush is on a hunt for something that Iraq used to have but now doesnt have anymore
Posts: 1,515
Threads: 75
Joined: Jan 2005
Reputation:
0
SDSnyper Wrote:oh **** iraq, i think we need to just wipe out every terrorist and kill any civilian that resists, we need to start getting savage with these ****ers, its the only way the terrorism bullshit will stop.mad:
America's enough of a world bully already dude. That's the last thing we need. We couldn't afford to lose any more respect on the world level. People hate us enough for invading, what would they think of going in and murdering civilians, assasinating their ex-dictator, and claiming we did what was right. How would it look if another country, came, invaded, killed you and your family because you didn't want them in your home, killed Bill Clinton, and said they were helping us?
Posts: 438
Threads: 29
Joined: Jan 2005
Reputation:
0
pyrocrow Wrote:America's enough of a world bully already dude. That's the last thing we need. We couldn't afford to lose any more respect on the world level. People hate us enough for invading, what would they think of going in and murdering civilians, assasinating their ex-dictator, and claiming we did what was right. How would it look if another country, came, invaded, killed you and your family because you didn't want them in your home, killed Bill Clinton, and said they were helping us?
i probally wouldnd like it, but i still hold my opinion.
Posts: 2,420
Threads: 161
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
0
well today one of saddams lawyers got killed, i know the iraq/world hate him but that will only delay his trial further
Please vote for us, it takes you 5 seconds.
Posts: 1,515
Threads: 75
Joined: Jan 2005
Reputation:
0
10-22-2005, 06:52 AM
(This post was last modified: 10-22-2005, 03:33 PM by pyrocrow.)
Maybe saddam had his lawyer assasinated to delay the trial? At first it sounds proposterous, but think about it a second. mmm...
Posts: 3,722
Threads: 177
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation:
0
SDSnyper Wrote:oh **** iraq, i think we need to just wipe out every terrorist and kill any civilian that resists, we need to start getting savage with these ****ers, its the only way the terrorism bullshit will stop.mad: it would be different if america where the weaker country. Very fcuking different.
thats an appaling thing to say.
Posts: 438
Threads: 29
Joined: Jan 2005
Reputation:
0
Oresama Wrote:it would be different if america where the weaker country. Very fcuking different.
thats an appaling thing to say.
its only my personal opinion, not like u have to belive like that tooblank:
Posts: 2,812
Threads: 44
Joined: Jan 2005
Reputation:
0
pyrocrow Wrote:Maybe saddam had his assasinated to delay the trial? At first it sounds proposterous, but think about it a second. mmm... with saddam it would be pretty consistent with his personality
Posts: 2,420
Threads: 161
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
0
yea agree with dacougarmech, its certainly within saddams psychotic bevhaviour, also maybe he did'nt like the defense he was getting and decide to take him out thats also possible i mean the man is a lose cannon
Posts: 45
Threads: 6
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
0
After listening to the stuff going on about the trial, I bet some one might try to take out Saddam before the trial is out. I wouldn't put it past some one.
Posts: 1,515
Threads: 75
Joined: Jan 2005
Reputation:
0
10-25-2005, 03:15 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-25-2005, 03:28 PM by pyrocrow.)
NightHawk Wrote:After listening to the stuff going on about the trial, I bet some one might try to take out Saddam before the trial is out. I wouldn't put it past some one.
Why would you kill him? He's gonna get executed anyways. Why not make him see his future and slowly progress through death. That seems to have more justice for him than bullets. If he isn't convicted, which shouldn't be possible, kill him and the judge, and his lawyers. Seems fairer that way.
Posts: 2,420
Threads: 161
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
0
I agree pyro but people are impatient, and might not want to wait for justice to take its course
Please vote for us, it takes you 5 seconds.
|