Posts: 3,722
Threads: 177
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation:
0
FrogMan Wrote:7/10 pyro you improving personally to much brushing on render and don't like text
two new sigs, plz rate
now if i only knew how to cut out the white and make it transparent so that they don't show up in my sigs
![[Image: cutoutgokucopy1uu.jpg]](http://img471.imageshack.us/img471/2894/cutoutgokucopy1uu.jpg)
![[Image: 11copy0la.png]](http://img362.imageshack.us/img362/5062/11copy0la.png) That render is awfull. Someone magic wanded it and hlf his head and sowrd are missing
Posts: 2,420
Threads: 161
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
0
pyro not bad 7/10 just looks a bit to plaing to me
Please vote for us, it takes you 5 seconds.
Posts: 8,101
Threads: 368
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation:
0
The Hidden
Comment.
![[Image: spidermancopy.jpg]](http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y239/alfzz/spidermancopy.jpg)
If You Want To Lose Weight, You NEED To Read This First!
www. myfastwaytoloseweight.com
Posts: 2,420
Threads: 161
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
0
dont like it tom much alfz 6.5/10 looks like a tad to much of the sharpen tool, just does'nt gel together for me
Please vote for us, it takes you 5 seconds.
Posts: 896
Threads: 42
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation:
0
Foog Wrote:you're doing what i did. they're all the same brush sets, all the same technique, the same colors and the same blending. try and break free a little bit- i stopped making sigs just now bc theyre all the same.
check out some older stuff-
![[Image: ascend.jpg]](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v664/closet_/ascend.jpg)
![[Image: 1e7b4ca9.jpg]](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v664/closet_/1e7b4ca9.jpg)
![[Image: brilliant.jpg]](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v664/closet_/brilliant.jpg)
![[Image: vector4.jpg]](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v664/closet_/vector4.jpg)
![[Image: ryu.jpg]](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v664/closet_/ryu.jpg)
![[Image: defiantcopy.jpg]](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v664/closet_/defiantcopy.jpg)
dont rate them all, but tell if any particular you like and if i should current any. sup guys, glad to see theres still sum people goin on this stuff. i havent made much in almost a year now, besides photomanipulation projects. we used to be all over these thread from a year ago now to almost 2 years before then, lol. good times.
foog,
1. favorite of the bunch, nice colors, not too hard on the eyes, decent blending, but text needs work 7.5/10
2. not feelin it....at all. not a skill rating but a personal reference rating 2/10
3. good concept, colors need work, has nice potential. 7/10
4. s.a. #2. 2/10
5. looks good, good text, blending a little harsh however. 6/10
6. like the background, and text, all it needs is a bit of brush blending. 6.5/10
Posts: 1,515
Threads: 75
Joined: Jan 2005
Reputation:
0
Alfzzz- it looks like multiple seperate sigs in one box the way the brushing curves against each other. Nice text though.
![[Image: seahwangtyraelsig0cy.jpg]](http://img498.imageshack.us/img498/875/seahwangtyraelsig0cy.jpg)
Plz rate
Posts: 1,596
Threads: 71
Joined: Jan 2005
Reputation:
0
Good brushing and I kinda like the colors, but the render is whored and the text is terrible. I can't even read it.. You really need to put a 1-2 pixel stroke on the cape text. 3/10 because of the brushing, but it's really not a lot else.
EDIT: New sig I just made... Took me quite a while to figure out why it didn't look good at all at first... Turns out I had a contrast layer that was screwing eveything up.
Posts: 2,420
Threads: 161
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
0
10-29-2005, 08:28 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-29-2005, 11:44 PM by FrogMan.)
sarcasm, brushing is nice plus u got some multicolour in your sig, blending of render is good, text is decent but i can't really see render and personal not a fan of border, overall its good 8/10
my new sig, plz rate
Please vote for us, it takes you 5 seconds.
Posts: 2,982
Threads: 107
Joined: Aug 2004
Reputation:
0
frogman- awful render. you cut off the important part, IN THE SIG, and shittily render the top. redo the render.
Posts: 2,420
Threads: 161
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
0
10-30-2005, 01:26 AM
(This post was last modified: 10-30-2005, 02:54 AM by FrogMan.)
u mean like this foog, also it looks like the render has rough edges don't know why it doesn't look like that in photoshop, might because its a gif, but jpeg show a white background eh..
heres is the jpeg then the gif
heres a new one from me, plz rate
Please vote for us, it takes you 5 seconds.
Posts: 1,596
Threads: 71
Joined: Jan 2005
Reputation:
0
The brushing and coloring is nice, but stop doing pop-outs! I haven't yet seen a pop-out that just blew me away. They're just stupid, in my opinion, and useless. You can't use a pop-out as a sig.
Posts: 2,420
Threads: 161
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
0
i wish people would post more sigs anyway
heres my new sig, don't know which one looks better please rate both
and
Please vote for us, it takes you 5 seconds.
Posts: 1,515
Threads: 75
Joined: Jan 2005
Reputation:
0
To me, they look very simaler. I seem to like the top more though because it has more color.
![[Image: nighthawksig4mt.jpg]](http://img63.imageshack.us/img63/5075/nighthawksig4mt.jpg) I feel good about this one, plz rate though.
Posts: 440
Threads: 20
Joined: Jul 2005
Reputation:
0
11-02-2005, 01:22 PM
(This post was last modified: 11-02-2005, 01:32 PM by Rampage.)
gj pyrocrow, 7/10 dont like the border very much...and try to get new brushes...deviantart.com
This was a quickie...
Posts: 2,420
Threads: 161
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
0
not bad sarevok gj on background know just start working on text and render blending 7/10
Please vote for us, it takes you 5 seconds.
Posts: 1,596
Threads: 71
Joined: Jan 2005
Reputation:
0
Wow. You guys are giving away ratings that are waaay too high, I'm sorry.
Pyro: Text is bad, looks just like black text with a glow backing... Which it is. Purple is totally the wrong color, and the background has far too many black splotches. 4/10
Sarevok: You've improved, but you're still not yet good. Text is bad, don't put it on the render, put a stroke on it, and don't do gradients. Pure gradients for text is bad and pretty lazy in my opinion. Background is really pixelated and too edgy, bad coloring and just almost non-existant brushing. 3/10
FrogMan: Brushing is good, but the text just ruins it. You need to get some better texts, preferrably grungy-looking ones and never have pixel text bigger than 12. I always use either Unborn edition or Visitor 1 on 10. As said already, just plain text with a gradient doesn't cut it. It NEVER fits in... Ever. Go to pixel2life.com and look at a text tutorial.
Posts: 2,420
Threads: 161
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
0
well cold someone give the damn sig a rating now, also pyro it looks like your sig has to much contrast on it and the renders is not blended well enough
Please vote for us, it takes you 5 seconds.
Posts: 494
Threads: 15
Joined: Jan 2005
Reputation:
0
Havent been here for a while, but I should try something.
Posts: 983
Threads: 44
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
0
woo hoo i'm bored at work so i tried my hand at an extremely simple signature. cuz i was gettin tired of my stick-man deadlyy-guy.
Posts: 2,420
Threads: 161
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
0
11-03-2005, 04:20 AM
(This post was last modified: 11-03-2005, 04:56 AM by FrogMan.)
thats awaful deadly that brick effect is funny though, go get some tutorials
and epiq not border not that great brushing, tech part is good, 5/10 current much better
Please vote for us, it takes you 5 seconds.
|