Warden Updated!!

[Skitz-Ownage333]

GUYS! DONT USE ANY MAPHACKS OR ANYTHING! WARDEN JUST UPDATED AND EVERYTHING IS DETECTABLE!! im just warning you now.

[Skitz-Ownage333]

aaahh it posted twice! sorry i might have clicked back.. sorry.

[Lux Aeterna]

Nice double thread... but anyways thank you for updating us.. I guess.

[madderThanu]

Not "everything" is detectable, just badly written hacks like Easy*.

[ytzyt]

yes, i noticed with strings
it ususally unload itself when joining games
and now... seems......

hope i don't get banned
i'm not gonna use mh for now

[DaggothUr]

I been using stings still and I am still online friendly. However if I do get the boot, I have a second set of keys around.

[The_Klaggel2]

"Not "everything" is detectable, just badly written hacks like Easy*."
- Well since you seem to be the expert programmer, show me the poorly coded sections... People make mistakes, even MP admits to this. I can refer you the thread if you wish.... Maybe you should go program an undetectable mh - oh and you better do it on your first try, or of course it will be poorly coded...
Easyplay is an ongoing project that Jan is and has been working on. With every update the program has grown and become better. You can't expect people to make a perfect product when they are still learning/growing etc.

[madderThanu]

You'd think after two mass banning he could at least get the damn thing to unload properly, especially after one of his updates was designed exactly for this kind of scenario. Since I don't have the source code I am unable to point out the poorly coded sections, but they obviously exist or EP users wouldn't be banned right now.

[jackass88]

hehe i was already in chat and my mouse was over the maphack exe when i decided to have a look at the forums

[RaZzor]

I am using stings and I didn't get banned...so

[The_Klaggel2]

poorly coded sections,

IMO, there is a difference between a mistake/oversight and simply "poorly coded sections". A mistake or oversight being something which was simply not realised, whereas poorly coded sections originating out of complete ignorance of the correct way of doing something.

For instance

cout << "do whatever\n";
cout << "Don't do whatever/n";

Oh shit, wrong slash on the second Cout. Poorly coded? IMO, no, just a mistake. IF all throughout the program however, the coder used "/" instead of "\", b/c they were too stupid to realise they were doing it wrong, then it would be poorly coded.

This really isn't the best analagoy either though I guess - the programs in question are much more complicated. It's important to keep in mind too, that there are more than one way to accomplish the same thing (say antidetect), so it can be difficult to protect against every possible *weak* point in that said antidetect.