05-25-2006, 09:33 PM
perhapes all of you who responded have a hige comprehension problem. Such as the case with the idiot who said why waste you're time when you can kill ubers in 2 min with a smiter---obviously that person doesnt get the concept that any char can do ubers with ease if built properly
Second off hammerdins hammer damage ignores special resistances so you're totally 100% dead wrong on that---BTW I have cleared ubers in about 2 min 20 seconds with a hammerdin so STFU and dont open you're mouth unless you know what you're talking about TY
3rd off I never said MF% DIDN'T HELP---I mearly pointed out that you dont need huge amounts of MF to get good items
as for the clown about the SHAKO----you obviously must njot of read what I put about that----what I put is 100% true----I never mentioned anything about it being eisier or harder to say----I simply pointed out that a SHAKO is not a harlequin crest itself---
now that I have picked apart everything all of you have said is false...where are all the flws in what I said---you ppl do an awefull lot of talking about saying this is this and this is that and ppl are wrong----but only one of you provided any real explination as to why they thought what they did--and even that turned out to be wrong
when are you ppl going to learn that if you really read what I wrote instead of just answering it the way you feel like it---you will see just how right I am
Second off hammerdins hammer damage ignores special resistances so you're totally 100% dead wrong on that---BTW I have cleared ubers in about 2 min 20 seconds with a hammerdin so STFU and dont open you're mouth unless you know what you're talking about TY
3rd off I never said MF% DIDN'T HELP---I mearly pointed out that you dont need huge amounts of MF to get good items
as for the clown about the SHAKO----you obviously must njot of read what I put about that----what I put is 100% true----I never mentioned anything about it being eisier or harder to say----I simply pointed out that a SHAKO is not a harlequin crest itself---
now that I have picked apart everything all of you have said is false...where are all the flws in what I said---you ppl do an awefull lot of talking about saying this is this and this is that and ppl are wrong----but only one of you provided any real explination as to why they thought what they did--and even that turned out to be wrong
when are you ppl going to learn that if you really read what I wrote instead of just answering it the way you feel like it---you will see just how right I am