Posts: 2
Threads: 1
Joined: Jun 2007
Reputation:
0
I have been waiting a long time for SC2 to come out ever since I finished #1. It had it's own look, style and a kickass storyline!!!! Now after viewing the flash trailer and stuff at the site, IT LOOKS JUST LIKE WARCRAFT III!!! The protoss look like freakin night elves and everything just looks too...."soft". SC1 had an edgier look to it than other games, like everything was made of solid stone. SC2 trailers look like rubber. Has anyone noticed this? How the female protoss kinda look like night elf archers??!!
Posts: 3,341
Threads: 358
Joined: Jun 2006
Reputation:
0
I noticed too, but then again brood war was made when?
and this is 2008...
things change.
Posts: 844
Threads: 90
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
0
well, i sort of agree with Metal here, i think they should have made SC2 more realistic, not cartoonish, but still it has its pros and graphics are decent 2
TigerOIP
Posts: 1,310
Threads: 49
Joined: Jun 2007
Reputation:
0
I'm very glad Starcraft II is coming out. However, I'm a little ticked off by the extremely ugly bunker and tanks they have created. -_-
I'm not the only person mad either. They actually said they redesigned the tank and maybe the bunker but I'm not sure, because of people arguing about how ugly it is.
Please add to my Reputation if you find my post reasonable, beneficial, or helpful. Thanks. =]
Posts: 3,341
Threads: 358
Joined: Jun 2006
Reputation:
0
Yeah it was originally a siege tank
now its some sort of new one, released two days ago or so.
Still looks ugly to me, I think Zerg look the best.
Posts: 844
Threads: 90
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
0
yeah zerg is defenately the best looking race so far
TigerOIP
Posts: 1,931
Threads: 140
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation:
0
i think they wanted to make the graphics as good as they could while still sticking with the Orginal starcraft looks. then again you all realize that they could not change anything and we would all probably still buy it
You said so much without ever parting your lips.
![[Image: tap100.jpg]](http://ghsyahoo.homestead.com/files/tap100.jpg)
Posts: 2
Threads: 1
Joined: Jun 2007
Reputation:
0
it's just that I've been on an half-life 2 binge lately and it looks so damn real that it's become my standard for computer graphics. But the least blizzard could do is make everything a little less "bouncy" looking. Even though this bothers me, I'm still gonna buy it the minute it hits the shelves lol 
Posts: 3,341
Threads: 358
Joined: Jun 2006
Reputation:
0
Exactly, no matter what the graphics look like, no matter what you dont like you will get it anyways
haha
=]
Posts: 1,310
Threads: 49
Joined: Jun 2007
Reputation:
0
Ares Wrote:Yeah it was originally a siege tank
now its some sort of new one, released two days ago or so.
Still looks ugly to me, I think Zerg look the best.
Another one was released? I thought they released the better looking tank (in their perspective) awhile ago.
Please add to my Reputation if you find my post reasonable, beneficial, or helpful. Thanks. =]
Posts: 3,341
Threads: 358
Joined: Jun 2006
Reputation:
0
It was Siege tank at first
then they made a Crucio Siege tank
and in my opinion it looks terrible!
much worse then original
StarCraft II
check it out
Posts: 2,420
Threads: 161
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
0
Personally I think thats what made SC1 so great the graphics and atmosphere and thats the winning formula they are trying to stick with. Game is not all about the graphics always just look at WoW graphics are not bad really but there are games out there with much better.
![[Image: Sig2Vectorcopy.png]](http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c368/Winman4000/Sig2Vectorcopy.png)
Please vote for us, it takes you 5 seconds.
Posts: 1,931
Threads: 140
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation:
0
Ares Wrote:It was Siege tank at first
then they made a Crucio Siege tank
and in my opinion it looks terrible!
much worse then original
StarCraft II
check it out
Am i wrong or does this new tank not have splash dmg?
You said so much without ever parting your lips.
Posts: 3,341
Threads: 358
Joined: Jun 2006
Reputation:
0
Tap Wrote:Am i wrong or does this new tank not have splash dmg?
Still has splash
Posts: 1,310
Threads: 49
Joined: Jun 2007
Reputation:
0
Well the Crucio Siege Tank was what they were always called and it was the name of it once they had a description of it on the website. Its still exactly the same tank, except they changed the graphics so its different from the video previews because people like me keeps rambling about how ugly it is. And it still is.
Edit: I looked at it again, its freakin a box. They tried to put the hardy feel to it and it just didn't work out. Its too thick. I think its because they don't want them to be small, because if its small people can fit too much into one area. Take a look at the screen shot. Three tanks occupied one cliff.
Please add to my Reputation if you find my post reasonable, beneficial, or helpful. Thanks. =]
Posts: 53
Threads: 0
Joined: Mar 2010
Reputation:
0
Posts: 7,975
Threads: 764
Joined: Jun 2003
Reputation:
0
Dadgum dude? You are 2 years late to this thread... 0.o
I am thinking more about laughing than infracting you!..........
Then I remind myself...it is ALL new to anyone joining the forums.... take care and post away^^
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
A Light in your Darkness...always there...and burning...
|
![[Image: M1.gif]](http://i451.photobucket.com/albums/qq232/iamjoshii/M1.gif)
