Posts: 1,963
Threads: 134
Joined: Aug 2004
Reputation:
0
I went to edit my sig today, and apparently the max image size was changed, because it will no longer accept it. The max height size is now 125 when a little while ago it took my 130 pix high sig. Alot of people have sigs larger then that and I think that 125 pix is rediculus, it should be raised.
Posts: 2,186
Threads: 48
Joined: Jun 2004
Reputation:
0
What?!?! 130!?! My sigs are 150 hight. I've never had a problem.
Posts: 2,186
Threads: 48
Joined: Jun 2004
Reputation:
0
Ok, thats crazy. Someone please make this bigger for us sig makers please.
Posts: 1,963
Threads: 134
Joined: Aug 2004
Reputation:
0
I dont know what whoever adjusted it was thinking, 125 is rediculus.
Posts: 8,101
Threads: 368
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation:
0
125 is still too big imo...In the past was 420x120....Raised it i see...
Why the hell would u want such huge height? Vertical sigs?!
![[Image: spidermancopy.jpg]](http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y239/alfzz/spidermancopy.jpg)
If You Want To Lose Weight, You
NEED To Read This First!
www. myfastwaytoloseweight.com
Posts: 2,186
Threads: 48
Joined: Jun 2004
Reputation:
0
Your kidding me, look at my sig. That's 150, doesn't look big to me.
Posts: 1,963
Threads: 134
Joined: Aug 2004
Reputation:
0
420x120 is too small, sigs arent way too big untill there over 500 width and over 150 hieght.
Theres a bunch of wasted space for your profile info n stuff anyway.
Arg, spit says the rules always been 125x450, he just never enforced it till now.
Posts: 685
Threads: 16
Joined: May 2005
Reputation:
0
Big sigs also make it lag a bit for the 56k user. Now remember that we can't forget about the 56kers.