Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Signatures
#1
I went to edit my sig today, and apparently the max image size was changed, because it will no longer accept it. The max height size is now 125 when a little while ago it took my 130 pix high sig. Alot of people have sigs larger then that and I think that 125 pix is rediculus, it should be raised.
Reply
#2
What?!?! 130!?! My sigs are 150 hight. I've never had a problem.
Reply
#3
Go try and edit your sig right now, it disallows sigs over 125 height and over 450 width.

Quote:The maximum size for images in your signature is height 125 and width 450 pixels
Reply
#4
Ok, thats crazy. Someone please make this bigger for us sig makers please.
Reply
#5
I dont know what whoever adjusted it was thinking, 125 is rediculus.
Reply
#6
125 is still too big imo...In the past was 420x120....Raised it i see...

Why the hell would u want such huge height? Vertical sigs?!
[Image: spidermancopy.jpg]
If You Want To Lose Weight, You NEED To Read This First!
www. myfastwaytoloseweight.com
Reply
#7
Your kidding me, look at my sig. That's 150, doesn't look big to me.
Reply
#8
420x120 is too small, sigs arent way too big untill there over 500 width and over 150 hieght.

Theres a bunch of wasted space for your profile info n stuff anyway.

Arg, spit says the rules always been 125x450, he just never enforced it till now.
Reply
#9
Tahu Wrote:Go try and edit your sig right now, it disallows sigs over 125 height and over 450 width.


Yeah, alot of places are cutting down on big bandwith sigs...hooray! but 125 is very small
Reply
#10
Big sigs also make it lag a bit for the 56k user. Now remember that we can't forget about the 56kers.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  signatures The Mob 1 337 01-17-2006, 03:57 AM
Last Post: Aemaeth
  Help With Signatures T-PaC32 3 342 11-21-2005, 04:05 PM
Last Post: T-PaC32

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)