Signature Showoff Thread

[[/sarcasm]]

Too much brushing on the render, background could be much better, font is so-so and kinda superficial... And again, too much brushing on th render, especially his face. Plus, vertical sigs are useless. 5/10

[Jabsco]

SK- that is a super hard tech to do, try it with a bigger render or an abstract one

[bigdeath]

Man yall try to go too complex with the filtering and overdo it alot. But if its what yall like....

[Rampage]

lol what filtering?

PS: its hard to use my right hand
*cries* i broke it

[Jabsco]

eh, dont know whos to rate so there all eh, 5-8/10ish

here my new, might as well hop on the abstract band wagon

[FrogMan]

very nicely done .. dont like font used .. 9/10

plz rate



and rate this one plz... it has no brushes in it

[pyrocrow]

SBA- It's amazing. 10/10

fm-the color on the top one doesn't match well. I like the bottom one better but it lacks definition in the background. The text's are the exact same. 7/10, 8/10


new bg type. Rate plz.

[chicken24]

FM-Yea i agree.. your text still look similar to me.. but other then that, i like it.8/10

Pyro-The background is awesome. it works really well with the xbox theme. It dont look like theres a whole lot to it.. but i could be wrong.. Bg is really nice overall. 8.5/10

[pyrocrow]

it's still pretty monotone. I don't like the text and it's kind of plain. Raise the opacity back up on the army guy render. I like the theme though.

[Jabsco]

sub-week, no brushing, no manip, all you did was patching and one layer of color-3/10

[pyrocrow]

It seems like nothing but a render and a few colored clouds, I don't like this one. You can do better. 5/10


plz rate this one some more. I know I didn't blend the renders, and I really don't care. My emphasis was a new background type. The renders got kinda slopped on there.

[Jabsco]

it not bad requests suck tho, i would have used a 360 tho not the x-box circle, ne ways for matching the request 7/10 for no x box pic, but as far as over all sigs go eh 5/10, and that was nto my work, my best buddies first ask metopost, i told him it was too smal and it sucked but he would not listen of well thanks ne ways

[chicken24]

rate plz

[Jabsco]

ok so i have been patient, but now im gonna be beligerant, use brushes, and stop the mono tone, and stop the pic bg, thy suck, 5/10

[pyrocrow]

ok so i have been patient, but now im gonna be beligerant, use brushes, and stop the mono tone, and stop the pic bg, thy suck, 5/10

I say 1/10. That really sucks and it's not an improvement. Also, don't forget to rate those above you. Remember the karma.

I just made this sig for the tutorial I made. Chicken, check out the tutorial, as should everyone else, it will help. But here's the sig. Rate please.

EDIT: The text IMO was awful there, so I redid it.



not much better. Which is better, and comment plz.

[FrogMan]

very cool... nice idea.. but u right the text is awful 8/10

chicken everyone is right u need to staret improving... u can visit my tut or plenty other tuts

[fleaflickerx]

its not bad the text is better on the second two pyro

im still a sig noob but ive been trying, i got new fonts









These were made for some firends at another forums.

[FrogMan]

hmm flea not a bad start but have a look at a few tuts.. also start putting borders on yr sigs

[Jabsco]

dont lie to the poor kid, there crap, 1/10 on all of them, ne ways, look a tuts
here is a nother crappy abstract

[10 man]

ITS GARBAGE, TRASH , TOILET STAINS. . . . jk. . . but seriously i cant make out to much of the detail on the render with the white background and being that the image is small (small being sig size) i would actually like to see both those in a bigger size. but ill give it annnn ohhhhh... i duno... 6/10 for being kinda baren and not being able to see the details in it. oh and BTW.. my ratings are trash . im going off nothing but my personal openion. oh and now that your not going anywhere we should do that 3 way sig we were gona do.