Poll: who shold be a next superpower?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
China
51.11%
23 51.11%
Russia
11.11%
5 11.11%
India
13.33%
6 13.33%
Canada
17.78%
8 17.78%
Australia
6.67%
3 6.67%
Total 45 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
who should be a superpower if usa ever winds down?
meh, global warming will kill us sooner.... lol
US East L/NL-arowws4 arowws5 uber/organ runs for free. Free items too. Just ask. Must be member of this site.
[url=http://www.unleashmybrain.com][/url]
Reply
global warming itself will not kill us...its not going to suddenly get so hot that we all die, but there are a few things that global warming could cause that might kill us
Reply
Quote:american farmers are VERY productive.
Very true, and with splicing and genetically enhanced produce is becoming easier to manage becuase alot of these crops are engineered against parasites and disease. During my brief stay in college my suitemate worked for University of Idaho Agriculture R&D and did that kind of neat stuff. I never in my life thought growing peas would be so fascinating.
Reply
India signed for nuclear reactors and believe it or not it has 21 nuclear reactors!!!The strange thing is that India has not signed the agreement to not use nuclear weapons.WTF are they joking us?
Reply
well there is a big chance that global warming will kill us due to the fact that it is caused by the thinning of the ozone layer in which protects us from harmful uv radiation and if we were to lose that entirely well it would be something like that apple or orange in the movie "the core" just not that much over kill
we coudl most likely die from sunburns if that were to happen or some other unknown reason
Reply
Quote:
originally posted by venom
we need another world war to thin the population out we can barely support the 3rd world countires and with the stready rise in the world population it will be impossable to feed the world or most of it

WWII was the most bloody was in human history(almost 100% sure) and the total death toll(civilians and all) was 36,000,000(36mil). the total earth population is 6,000,000,000+(over 6bil). so you figure 6bil/100=60mil. so 60mil is 1% of earths total population. so WWII cliamed about .5% of earths total population. thats nothing. a war wouldn't thin out the population that much. even if WWIII had double the death toll.

theres a book by tom clancy called red storm rising about WWIII. i never read it i too lazy though but i heard its good.
As long as darkness flows through my veins, I will never cease, As long as my dreams still haunt me, I will never show mercy, and as long as evil lives I will never die.....
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Reply
off topic, but yes red storm rising was a good book...there are a lot more books about ww3 out there, not sure what your point was
Reply
i hate to correct you but its 55 million

hi im back and trying not to be annoying
[Image: 2hgwxzk.gif]
President of the Mathalamus Republic, Representative of Insane Creative people.
Alignment: True Neutral
Reply
darn...i was enjoying your abscense....but what are you talking about? what was 55 million? no one has posted in this thread for almost 2 weeks so you cant just expect us to know what you are talking about
Reply
in world war 2 there are 55 million deaths

Additional Comment:
... i wont be posting much cuz im on my gramndmas comp and im only here every other weekend so umm u enjoyed it

Additional Comment:
off topic but in star trek there were 600 milion deaths in ww3

thats 9.8% of current earth population
[Image: 2hgwxzk.gif]
President of the Mathalamus Republic, Representative of Insane Creative people.
Alignment: True Neutral
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)