06-21-2007, 04:17 PM
can anyone tell me which of thies Processors are the best out of thies three
(They all are AMD)
Thanks
Athlon 64
Athlon 64 FX
Athlon 64 X2
(They all are AMD)
Thanks
Athlon 64
Athlon 64 FX
Athlon 64 X2
Which of thies processers are better?
|
06-21-2007, 04:17 PM
can anyone tell me which of thies Processors are the best out of thies three
(They all are AMD) Thanks Athlon 64 Athlon 64 FX Athlon 64 X2
06-22-2007, 12:23 AM
The X2 series I believe are the fastest, but it really depends on what models you are comparing. If you are looking for a new processor, I highly reccommend looking away from AMD and taking a look at Intel's Core 2 Duo series. Very nice chips.
06-23-2007, 09:58 AM
From fastest to slowest (generally)
64 FX 64 X2 64 FX are extreme gaming/multimedia proc's X2 are dual core 64 single core pos's Some X2's are better then some FX's, and alot of new FX's are designed to run 2 chips, different then a dual core machine. They have 2 actual chips and 2 motherboard slots each filled with a processor. They are very fast but very expensive. Some AMD chips can be just as fast as Core 2 Duo's, but you generally have to pay more for performance you could get cheaper from intel.
06-23-2007, 07:09 PM
Exactly what dan sai FX is a double processor very fast very expensive but also X2 is also a gaming processor cheaper and a single chip with two cores to split up operations.
In the end probably X2 seeing that it is cheaper but also because it is the latest technology from AMD so probably more in the future can be experimented with the chip. ![]() Please vote for us, it takes you 5 seconds.
06-24-2007, 12:30 PM
FX's are still faster then X2's, but you have to pay alot more for that performance.
And X2's are not gaming proc's. they are not designed as such. FX's are dedicated gaming procs. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|