Poll: McAffe or Norton
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
McAffe
11.11%
2 11.11%
Norton
50.00%
9 50.00%
Neither
38.89%
7 38.89%
What?!?!
0%
0 0%
Total 18 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
McAffe or Norton
#1
Which do u prefer?
#2
Norton. Mcafee takes longer to load, and it loads more extra crap. It scans too slow for me as well, and its not updated as frequently.
#3
I agree, norton is much better, i used to use mcafee, big suxorz :rollseyes:
#4
what about symantec? i get that through school. lifetime subscription.
#5
I thought Symantec was the company that owns Norton.
#6
TooMuchProzac! Wrote:I thought Symantec was the company that owns Norton.

correct

i would no doubt choose Norton's over McAffe any day, symantec to really quick to patch and come out virus removal tools
#7
Neither.

Kaspersky > All
#8
etanol Wrote:Neither.

Kaspersky > All

agreed, even the free AVG is better than mcaffe and norton's
#9
Is Kaspersky expensive?
#10
HEYman Wrote:Is Kaspersky expensive?
http://www.kaspersky.com/store
http://www.kaspersky.com/buyoffline

The real-time protection in Kaspersky is awesome, though it might slow your system down a lot if you're running it on an older computer.

Try the trial version out, or the online scanner. With it you can scan individual files under the size of 1 MB.

http://www.kaspersky.com/scanforvirus
#11
Ahhhh so thats how you tell us if they have viruses or not


Personal Products

Our home user products are available for immediate downloading.

[indent] Kaspersky Anti-Virus Personal 4.5 and 5.0

Kaspersky Anti-Hacker 1.5



Which one?


[/indent]
#12
mcafee updates fast for me, i got 4 in one day once.
#13
HEYman Wrote:Ahhhh so thats how you tell us if they have viruses or not


Personal Products

Our home user products are available for immediate downloading.
[indent] Kaspersky Anti-Virus Personal 4.5 and 5.0

Kaspersky Anti-Hacker 1.5



Which one?


[/indent]
The first one. You might want to take the real-time protection off at first, it might lag your system a lot.
#14
thanks
#15
It's made by Russians Tongue
#16
omfg etanol, dude i downloaded started scanning, noticed that my internet was running at about half the speed, was fine with it because you told me it would lag me, after about 10 minutes, it was at 0% i looked and it said expected finish is 8/20/04...A ****ing month..I then tried to exit, my computer froze and i restarted, this happened about 4 times because of that stupid program, i finaly got on and it took about 10 minutes for kasparky(or whatever that ****ing thing is called) to load, i finally checked off "run at my startup" so now i restarted my computer and am sitting now right here really ****ing pissed..How the hell do you use that thing?
#17
hahaha sorry that just made me crack up.
#18
See where it says "Real-Time Protection is enabled/disabled."? You should disable it, if your computer can't handle it, it uses a lot of resources.
#19
Will the virus check run faster then a month after i disable it?
#20
If you're using real-time protection it's basicly scanning everything you do, so you're really safe, but of course it uses a lot of resources. So take it off, it's not that vital.

And the scanning isn't faster than it's with others, since Kaspersky checks some things the others don't, but your computer will run a lot smoother.


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  norton 2004 help mrtikki2 1 202 09-09-2004, 01:35 PM
Last Post: CheshireCat
  Norton Activation Code Demonic 1 370 09-06-2004, 05:56 AM
Last Post: CheshireCat
  Norton Antivirus 2004 Question Uber-Soldat 4 294 08-01-2004, 09:32 PM
Last Post: CheshireCat

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)