Blizzard Sector
AMD or Intel? - Printable Version

+- Blizzard Sector (https://www.blizzsector.co)
+-- Forum: General Community (https://www.blizzsector.co/forum-3.html)
+--- Forum: Tech Forum (https://www.blizzsector.co/forum-14.html)
+--- Thread: AMD or Intel? (/thread-14952.html)

Pages: 1 2


AMD or Intel? - Shihan - 01-31-2005

I like AMD! Big Grin


AMD or Intel? - PantallicA - 01-31-2005

Intel.


AMD or Intel? - Shihan - 01-31-2005

Using your Intel chip for heating? Wink


AMD or Intel? - PantallicA - 01-31-2005

Nah, that's why fans were invented.


AMD or Intel? - Shihan - 01-31-2005

You know that Prescot's are rated with TDP of 109W right? Tongue


AMD or Intel? - Foog - 01-31-2005

AMD. intel is more intended for one, high powered process, maybe two or three. AMD is used for more processes, more stable, so more of my kind of thing. speed demon vs. powerhouse...AMD.


AMD or Intel? - Shihan - 01-31-2005

Actually, I believe Intel is focusing on multi-tasking, as that's what their HT technology was made for.


AMD or Intel? - Tool - 01-31-2005

AMD is cheaper and faster. AMD. =D


AMD or Intel? - Shihan - 01-31-2005

w00t! Log another for AMD! ^_^


AMD or Intel? - Obfuscate - 01-31-2005

Both have their uses.

Intel is a video/picture editing along with extreme multitasking

AMD is great for games and the far more casual PC user who doesnt want to spend a litteral fortune on a PC while still having good performance. Lags a little on the multi-tasking end but for the most part holds its own for those who dont fill their taskbar or have CPU gobbeling applications.


AMD or Intel? - Shihan - 02-02-2005

I'm afraid that the FX-55 shows off Intel's brand new 3.8GHz chip in almost all editing tasks. Plus, I'm sure four dual-cored Opterons will show off anything that Intel's Xeons can throw at them.


AMD or Intel? - Obfuscate - 02-04-2005

Shihan Wrote:I'm afraid that the FX-55 shows off Intel's brand new 3.8GHz chip in almost all editing tasks. Plus, I'm sure four dual-cored Opterons will show off anything that Intel's Xeons can throw at them.

So $800-900 for a processor that gains...what...a few points over a $500-600 cheaper proc? Hmmm people will still use and should use Intel for image, video and music editing. AMD's lime light all comes from the extrordinary gaming performance. Beyond that I cant seem to find any recent news comparing the new 3.8 and FX-55 all the news I have found is between the 3.46EE and FX-55. Link to the FX-55 vs. P4 3.8 please.


AMD or Intel? - TuNa-FisH_SuShI - 02-04-2005

amd just cause my dad works their sry for posting this i just saw amd and had to say something :(


AMD or Intel? - A|fzZz - 02-04-2005

I got to say AMD...


AMD or Intel? - Shihan - 02-08-2005

Read Maximum PC. They've got the benchmarks to prove it. Also, both chips cost nearly 1000$ each.


AMD or Intel? - Obfuscate - 02-08-2005

I havent read the new Maximum PC yet but the performance increase from FX-53 to FX-55 just wasnt that much. I just cant see how the FX-55 would have suddenly jumped over intel in video and music encoding.


AMD or Intel? - EmptyII - 02-18-2005

AMD lover here........^_^


AMD or Intel? - Shadow-Hunter - 02-21-2005

I have to say AMD becouse i use it my self.. Smile but many ppl I know say that AMD is some cheap shit but it works fine for me ..


AMD or Intel? - Fykins - 02-21-2005

although i use AMD, i prefer intel
i just use amd cuzz im cheap


AMD or Intel? - Cauhtemoc - 02-27-2005

AMD all the way!