Poll: who shold be a next superpower?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
China
51.11%
23 51.11%
Russia
11.11%
5 11.11%
India
13.33%
6 13.33%
Canada
17.78%
8 17.78%
Australia
6.67%
3 6.67%
Total 45 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
who should be a superpower if usa ever winds down?
hellsing293 Wrote:mathalumus-a the only good thing you did was start the thread. all the rest of your posts were 1line ignorant opinions(which were mostly wrong).

Do you realize what you just said? All of his posts were one line opinions, and they were wrong?

How can you bash someone when you use statements like this? I just had to point that out. I still stand by my idea that we should fall back to communities and living off of the land, rather than policing the globe as super powers.
Reply
living off the land we wouldnt have all the cool stuff we have now...
Reply
mathalamus-a Wrote:hmm...never mind all my shit talk...
i just got off of wikipedia and the 3 potential superpowers are: china, India and the European union
What? You used something other than Star Trek?
mathalamus-a Wrote:no one has the strength to lift me and throw me off a bridge im 100 pounds
Please, 100 pounds is nothing, ever see World's Strongest Men competitions? They lift like 1000 pounds.
[Image: fuggyleetsignj8il7.jpg]
Nobody can handle the leetness of this sig.
' Wrote:Who loves orange soda?
Kel'thuzad loves orange soda!
Is it true?
YOUR CURIOSITY WILL BE THE DEATH OF YOU!
Reply
shrug...i can throw a 100 pd person about 4 feet up in the air...i know cause i've done it
Reply
Bloodangel26 Wrote:living off the land we wouldnt have all the cool stuff we have now...

No, you are right there. However, I personally would sacrafise all of this convience and technology to save Mother Earth and ensure future generations. At the rate we're going.. we'll destroy Mother Earth before she can destroy us.
Reply
that is true
(dont start flaming me just for this comment which will most most of ya off !00% certain)
we need another world war to thin the population out we can barely support the 3rd world countires and with the stready rise in the world population it will be impossable to feed the world or most of it
( time to see how much hate i will recive...)

the world strongest has one hell of a time just trying to lift that if you ever seen it, the stone ball contest its rare to see anyone get the 5th 550 pd up ovber there heads, but still that gtfo pic is still plausable (would be fantastic to see that done lol)
Reply
venom, the problem with your 'theory' is that it wouldnt be the 3rd world countrys that get their populations cut
Reply
i never stated that it was affecting olny 3rd would countries i guess i just forgot to space it appart since witht the curretn population we are having a hard enough time as it is trying to feed them all is was i was trying to get at and had nothing to do with my theroy of war is good and genocide is healthy for they planet theroy Tongue
Reply
Why the hell would you want a 3rd world war. Even if there was a 3rd World War that was there purely to control population there would be no way to get people to join the army without starting up the draft. What would posters say, "Join the army! Sacrifice yourself so that a anti-war hippie can live off the resources you would have once used!" or "Thanks for joining the army, now go out and die!".
[Image: fuggyleetsignj8il7.jpg]
Nobody can handle the leetness of this sig.
' Wrote:Who loves orange soda?
Kel'thuzad loves orange soda!
Is it true?
YOUR CURIOSITY WILL BE THE DEATH OF YOU!
Reply
Although I don't support a 3rd World War, it would greatly benefit the American economy. As for raising the army, it's pretty easy. Look at Iraq. Saying "Join the army so that a select few of civilians will make billions off the oil" is apparently a great propaganda tactic.
Reply
yes...cause thats the real reason the US went to iraq...not cause saddam murdered his own people for fun
Reply
that is the general message that was used in the other 2 wars just not worded so bluntly

and why should i even bother of defend that post if all i will get is flamed till i either conform to what you want or till i back off from the thread
so far its been 100% of my flaming prediction (even if it is a minor flame)
just answer me this , will we be able to support that vast nuber of people in the world by 2100 if current rate of population growth increased by about .5% every 5 years

that will be my olny defence to that post i made so flame me all you want about it just dont expect a retaliation or support of it since its just a "theroy"
as blood put it
Reply
how do you know by 2100 there wont be a huge innovation in agriculture and we wont have more than enough food? technology is a wonderful thing
Reply
Ever heard of population controlling laws? While that seems a little harsh, it could be a possibility for the US in the future. China's doing it, so why not us. That or we learn to terrafarm or w/e the **** its called other planets by that time. You also have to think of how much land is unsettled in the world, some of the chillier places could easily be made into good land. Most major powers in the world can support themselves, and have such a large surplus that they export assloads of food. So if worst comes to it, we could stop exporting.
Btw, Defending your opinion is fine, but being pro-genocide... come on you didn't expect people to agree with that did you?
[Image: fuggyleetsignj8il7.jpg]
Nobody can handle the leetness of this sig.
' Wrote:Who loves orange soda?
Kel'thuzad loves orange soda!
Is it true?
YOUR CURIOSITY WILL BE THE DEATH OF YOU!
Reply
yea...in china there are laws where you can like only have 1 or 2 kids...so parents like, drown their daughters so they can have sons, which are more prestigious or something....if they keep doing that there wont be any more need for population control because there wont be enough women...that would suck...i like women....
Reply
Bloodangel26 Wrote:yes...cause thats the real reason the US went to iraq...not cause saddam murdered his own people for fun

Yea, you're damn right we went to war for oil and not because saddam murdered his own people. The Uganda government murders its people for fun. Sudanese rebel camps kidnap children and submit them to public executions to desensatize them for war. African governments practice genocide and American doesn't stop them. The Chinese government kills Tibetans for fun and America doesn't stop them. So what's so special about Iraq? Oil.
Reply
american farmers are VERY productive. they have to be subsidized by the government so that they dont overflow the market with their products and drive prices down. if we allowed them to grow as much as they can, we can easily feed third world countries. the only problem would be transportation and distribution
Reply
DaCougarMech Wrote:american farmers are VERY productive. they have to be subsidized by the government so that they dont overflow the market with their products and drive prices down. if we allowed them to grow as much as they can, we can easily feed third world countries. the only problem would be transportation and distribution

this is true and a good point

Additional Comment:
yes.interesting Wrote:Yea, you're damn right we went to war for oil and not because saddam murdered his own people. The Uganda government murders its people for fun. Sudanese rebel camps kidnap children and submit them to public executions to desensatize them for war. African governments practice genocide and American doesn't stop them. The Chinese government kills Tibetans for fun and America doesn't stop them. So what's so special about Iraq? Oil.

does the uganda government constantly threaten to invade one of our allies? do they have the means to possibly produce chemical and nuclear weapons? do they support terrorist groups that attacked the US?

i'm not saying we shouldnt help the people in africa if we can, but theres way more reasons to be in iraq than there...and yes, maybe oil is one of them....but the others are more important
Reply
yes.interesting Wrote:Yea, you're damn right we went to war for oil and not because saddam murdered his own people. The Uganda government murders its people for fun. Sudanese rebel camps kidnap children and submit them to public executions to desensatize them for war. African governments practice genocide and American doesn't stop them. The Chinese government kills Tibetans for fun and America doesn't stop them. So what's so special about Iraq? Oil.

I have to agree with that. I mean, why the hell would America give a **** about all of that? Waste your own population to stop some genocide in some 3rd world country? Don't think so.
Reply
well duh that post was almost like me saying "im the next hitler!!!" or "all infidels must die!!!" but even then you never know what might happen from here till 2100 there could be some disaster making all tech useless and what not but hell we could die in like the next 10 years if your supersticious of that all psyics cant see past the year 2014 Tongue
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 18 Guest(s)