12-06-2005, 03:32 AM
Common sense bullshit - go through his code and find the logger. Furthermore, mouse cracked eplaygold1.5 - and made it available to everyone. He wouldn't do that if he knew there was malicious code in the program. You're not reporting the facts, you're just making wild conjectures because of your dislike of Jan.
"i don't have programming expirience or knowledge, what i have is common sense. the programmers at blizzard get PAID to beat ALL maphacks do you think they dont' know whats going on? its like this every time and not just with netter's maphacks others have been banned too as soon as they update warden. it doesnt' matter what kind of anti-detection anyone uses blizzard will beat it." - Isn't that just a long version of what I had previously stated?
" he does this for his own amusement not to better the game for everyone"
- Wow, I would never have imagined he would release such privy information to you? Oh wait, he didn't...
"if your gonna use a maphack use one thats not created by a known scammer because once again he can claim to be changed but that doesn't make it true."
-If YOU don't want to use Jan's mh becuase YOU are scared he might scam everyone, then don't use it. Because you have ABSOLUTELY NO PROOF that he has done ANYTHING wrong in the sence of loggers etc, all of your claims are just opinions - but you're just here to report the facts I thought? And as far as using a "safe" mh, which am I to use? Should I use the little known mh that has nearly 0 antidetection (Mouse at least is of this opinion), or should I use a "temporary fix"(cough..pos..cough) for the well known mh? I think I'll stick with Jan's
"i don't have programming expirience or knowledge, what i have is common sense. the programmers at blizzard get PAID to beat ALL maphacks do you think they dont' know whats going on? its like this every time and not just with netter's maphacks others have been banned too as soon as they update warden. it doesnt' matter what kind of anti-detection anyone uses blizzard will beat it." - Isn't that just a long version of what I had previously stated?
" he does this for his own amusement not to better the game for everyone"
- Wow, I would never have imagined he would release such privy information to you? Oh wait, he didn't...
"if your gonna use a maphack use one thats not created by a known scammer because once again he can claim to be changed but that doesn't make it true."
-If YOU don't want to use Jan's mh becuase YOU are scared he might scam everyone, then don't use it. Because you have ABSOLUTELY NO PROOF that he has done ANYTHING wrong in the sence of loggers etc, all of your claims are just opinions - but you're just here to report the facts I thought? And as far as using a "safe" mh, which am I to use? Should I use the little known mh that has nearly 0 antidetection (Mouse at least is of this opinion), or should I use a "temporary fix"(cough..pos..cough) for the well known mh? I think I'll stick with Jan's