almost deadly are you blind or what? you obviously can't read if you can't see the points i made.
1. shot down early or not it still supports the govt, not the conspiracists. you apparently chose to ignore that.
2. intercepted because it was thought to be a hijacked jet. again, you're too ignorant to notice the implication this makes. how, i don't know.
3, i said noting about the fires, i was talking about the steel, and i doubt wind would make that hotter. by timely manner i meant all the steal magically breaking at the same instant. that is impossible. you are blind.
3b, i don't know wht you mean either, but if PM is correct each floor should spew debree as a result. you obviously havent read anythign i wrote.
4. neither wtc7, NOR ANY STEEL BUILDING IN EXISTENCE, has collapsed as a result of internal fires. and by time i mean a matter of seconds. as in, one side of the building (the damaged side) would fall slightly sooner than the non damaged side. a mongrel could grasp this concept. the buildign fell together, orchestrated like an opera. the weight shifts and trusses are a SAFETY FEATURE!!! my brother is an architect but that hardly matters because a fool could understand that saftey features are designed TO HELP, NOT TO MAKE THINGS WORSE. LET ME SPELL IT OUT FOR YOU. A SAFETY FEATURE WOULD NOT ENSURE THAT THE ENTIRE BUILDING COLLAPSES. IT WOULD KEEP THE NON DAMAGED PORTIONS OF THE BUILDING WERE THERY WERE. THAT MEANS STILL STANDING IN THE SAME LOCATION UNDAMAGED.HELLOOOO
can you read? why are you intentionally blinding yourself? would you be that humiliated to find out that you're wrong?
Additional Comment:
ok almost deadly here's what i want to do. i've come to the conclusion that you will choose ignorance over any rational debate. you do not konw what it means to come up with your own ideas so i want to show you how. i want to focus on one point only. i think asking you to read so much (very little) is part of the problem.
i'm going to ask you a question that i haven't seen or heard from any "conspiracy theorist" and i want your opinions. not rehased jargon.
if terrorists can hijack planes and crash them into america (who you obviously think cannot defend herself) why have they stopped doing it? why do they nto continue the attack and drop planes all over the place, including dropping them on our army?
1. shot down early or not it still supports the govt, not the conspiracists. you apparently chose to ignore that.
2. intercepted because it was thought to be a hijacked jet. again, you're too ignorant to notice the implication this makes. how, i don't know.
3, i said noting about the fires, i was talking about the steel, and i doubt wind would make that hotter. by timely manner i meant all the steal magically breaking at the same instant. that is impossible. you are blind.
3b, i don't know wht you mean either, but if PM is correct each floor should spew debree as a result. you obviously havent read anythign i wrote.
4. neither wtc7, NOR ANY STEEL BUILDING IN EXISTENCE, has collapsed as a result of internal fires. and by time i mean a matter of seconds. as in, one side of the building (the damaged side) would fall slightly sooner than the non damaged side. a mongrel could grasp this concept. the buildign fell together, orchestrated like an opera. the weight shifts and trusses are a SAFETY FEATURE!!! my brother is an architect but that hardly matters because a fool could understand that saftey features are designed TO HELP, NOT TO MAKE THINGS WORSE. LET ME SPELL IT OUT FOR YOU. A SAFETY FEATURE WOULD NOT ENSURE THAT THE ENTIRE BUILDING COLLAPSES. IT WOULD KEEP THE NON DAMAGED PORTIONS OF THE BUILDING WERE THERY WERE. THAT MEANS STILL STANDING IN THE SAME LOCATION UNDAMAGED.HELLOOOO
can you read? why are you intentionally blinding yourself? would you be that humiliated to find out that you're wrong?
Additional Comment:
ok almost deadly here's what i want to do. i've come to the conclusion that you will choose ignorance over any rational debate. you do not konw what it means to come up with your own ideas so i want to show you how. i want to focus on one point only. i think asking you to read so much (very little) is part of the problem.
i'm going to ask you a question that i haven't seen or heard from any "conspiracy theorist" and i want your opinions. not rehased jargon.
if terrorists can hijack planes and crash them into america (who you obviously think cannot defend herself) why have they stopped doing it? why do they nto continue the attack and drop planes all over the place, including dropping them on our army?