Signature Showoff Thread

[SilverTears]

Hmm, havent been here for a while.

[-> The first one I love it because it just gets my touch to it 9/10 because may day is a bit hard to read/see

The second I rated on gfxsector. Gj dan


Here is something I made with messing around with C4D renders and a couple of blurs/modes and stuff like that

[FrogMan]

Not bad at all reallly could use a bit os sharpening overall, but i like is it alot 8/10.

[L4E]

well im back, a-****ing-gain with my latest and imo my personal best. I did not use a render because I've recently adopted a hate for renders as they just seem to take space for beautiful brushing

best viewed at 1280x1024 as usual.. otherwise its blurry or sumtin like that

[10 man]

i agree with you link, in all my hypocracy, i try not to use renders but i end up using them once in a while. anywayyyyys.. i like it sort of .. but i cant tell what it is. my screen is set up for print and im sure your gama is different than mine is so everything on my screen is brighter .. so with that being said.. its all washed out to me...i cant hardly see any details... i cant rate it man.

[Arbitzz]

i love the current sig you have dannation. Quite sweet 9/10

[FrogMan]

not bad arbitz needs a bit of sharpening and needs to use a bit of variation with yr brushing 6/10

here is a new one from me most might say its shit.. but i quite like it.. also considering that 95% of the sig was made by me smudgeing the render to make the bg anyway here we go

[Rampage]

REH i figured that someone would rate FM's by now so ill do it!

IMO FM its a C+, And because its a C+ (OR a 7.8) is that its to mono colored and the text looks funky in some parts and not realy in favor of the double render thing but other than that its pritty nice. GJ cool:

[jc1047]

i dont no about yall but i love that best looken thang iv seen n a wile but thats just me sep for the text

[fleaflickerx]

jc not bad text not readable and brushing kinda sucks an the render just looks a little tight

[FrogMan]

Not bad flea brushing is decent its overblended and text is a bit bleh 5/10 but you are improving.

[Rampage]

Was suposed to be an entry for SOTW#1 but its too big
and im realy liking popouts now
sure, its not eyecandy but im experiminting

[FrogMan]

Not bad sk but stop over using your current style 6/10 probably better but you kinda need to moveo on from your current style and branch out.

The pop out effect is very good.

[chicken24]

heres a sig i made for the sotw. I wasn't going to enter, because grunge isn't my style, but i decided to make a sig for it anyways.. :/ Rate!

[FrogMan]

Never really like soft grunge, and you still got ugly text, blending is nice though

6/10

[psd666]

hi im new to this site. i just made this signature for it. tell me what you think please.

[Jabsco]

not bad could use a lil more color, 5/10

and chicken there is a tut on how to make good text by me in the tut section

[10 man]

new one.

[FrogMan]

Its not bad i like it could of use a bit of blending maybe dont really like the border and its slightly to big.

But i like the style 8/10

[10 man]

and yet another one.

[UberGrossMann]

i like the render and i like how you blended it differently than most ppl would but i'm not really liking the background. I'm just not feeling it.

I remade my sotw entry with a different render, and since the left side was kinda blank i added some text. CnC please.