Poll: Melee or Spellcaster?

[Omnipotent]

I have always wondered which is the more popular type of character, Melee or Spellcaster, tell me your preference.

[dragonXX]

i like spellcaster cept 4 the part where they run alot

[becoming_cold]

i usually use spellcasters although its fun to be a wolf druid or ww sin every now and again

[Gaccett]

melle is mano y mano best man wins, no running away

[Noxius]

Hi!
I'm new around here...but i'm not new to the game.
I prefer spellcasters...but I also like melee characters. Each type has its advantages and disadvantages, so its mostly a personal choice.

[Banned-Soul]

I enjoy the fact that with melee characters you can run up and beat them senseless, as to being ten feet away and casting piece of ice like a little girl. Never really appealed to me, you know?

[Zak]

heh, i really enjoy a BArb Vs barb zerk duel or a Zon Vs Zon Jab duel because it really is the best who survives no P*U*S*S*Y sorcs tele'n everywhere shooting lil fire balls, or a zon runnin away while shooting a million guidded arrows into ur face (><) Melee!!!

[SOULfly]

To me, a pala vs a spellcaster, where the pala charges up to the wuss spellcaster and constantly hit her till she lost an ear.

[._| 3 Vv |3]

Honestly, for me, it all depends on what kind of mood i'm in at the moment... sometimes i feel like being a cheap ***** so i FoH the **** out of gaters, other times i feel like a challenge so i use my psnmancer (uses enigma tougher than it sounds) sometimes i feel like just running up and beating the good god **** out of someone... so i get my zealot... and sometimes i feel like glowing as i rape sum nubs... so i get my ik barb... see what i mean? it's all very relative.....in my case....

[Zak]

I play hardcore, so dueling games r very intresting..the other day there was a lv99zerker barb Vs. lvl98 bowz zon.......the zon died hehe i had my mule and grabbed da ear

[Nubli]

I prefer melee over all else, probably because my first character was a barb (now an empty lvl 81 barb). Zeal pally's are fun too with some LL and ML, so all you gotta do is hit the enemy and stand there. Spellcasters are fun because you get to look at pretty colors =P But they involve too much running and have some defensive problems.

[becoming_cold]

i still think bone necros own, they can take hits if built right and still f*ck over everyone (cept maybe FOHers)

[xXC.netXx]

Spellcaster are defentally more versitile than their melee cousins... adn allso allot more fun to use in my opinion. So yes defintly spellcasters!!!

Go TEAM SPELLCASTERS!!!

[Nubli]

Melee kicks ***.

[wilwil]

spellcaster for MF
melee for duel

just like melee as my first char was a WW barb

[KlankyKlause]

I like to swing, barbs and palas are the best i think, if you build a good barb with enigma you can make spellcasters bend over and scream. Spellcasting requires a bit more skill in the duel itself but building a zealot or a zerker is a bit harder than a spellcaster.

[MancerDJ]

Im slightly new to this forum. but i would say spell caster's. why is they take a lil bit more to know wich spells are better. well depending on the skill that you get. and its synergies. when a melee all you need is a good weapon or charms and you just beat the apponent senseless. when spell casters need to know what spells or what to use to combined with they're other spells like necro's. like they're curses and bone spells. but thats just what i think.

[chedder]

i duno all i know is barbs and necros suck palys own

[intriGue]

spellcasters are certainly more popular and best for most everything(that is unless trap sins and hammer dins cant be included

[DivMeh@West^^]

MEELE SUKS ASSS EVERYBODY KNOS THAT (((((((((((IRON MADAIN OWNS j00 ALL))))))))))))))))