Im Disapointed

[VakAtk1]

Im Disapointed in those Chigao Bears.. Im not ragenig them or anything, but I completly had my money set on the Bears winning, stupid PATS, stupid GROSSMAN. I mean there supposibly the "Best" NFC team, so why didnt they win? It just irrates me that the stupid pats won.

[bigdeath]

Ha wait till they play dem boys. It's all over for them then. Romos kickin ass.

[Bloodangel26]

even the best team cannot win every game. its obvious you dont know a lot about sports.

lets not sign romo's ticket to canton just yet.

[Fuggle]

I wouldn't say they are the best team in the NFC, I think the Cowboys are better than the Bears but w/e. Just because they have the best record in the NFC doesn't mean they are unstoppable nor the best team, hell they just lucked out on the schedule.

[Bloodangel26]

when grossman plays well they are the best team in the nfc maybe even nfl, but when he plays bad they are medicore at best and survive only by the greatness of their defense.

[ArrogantlyIgnorant]

i wouldn't say the bears are very good. grossman does good against the bad teams and doesn't show up for the good teams. doesn't matter much anyway, regardless who goes to the superbowl from the nfc the winner will be out of the afc.

[John]

Life is full of disappointments, get used to them i suggests. If the same teams kept winning, how would watching be interesting/fun, stuff like this is necessary to keep us involved.

[Fuggle]

AFC is far better than the NFC this year, and Blood that's a ****ing retarded thing to say, If everyone on the Falcons played good and well together they would ****ing rape everyone too, their team is full of good people, they just haven't been stepping up latel. Same goes with just about every team. If Plummer was more consistent the Broncos would win a lot more.

[Bloodangel26]

how is it retarded when its true? if he even just played decent they would still be a great team.

[Fuggle]

You said if he played well they would be the best team in the NFL. That is a terribly stupid thing to say, because most teams tend to have better players on them than the Bears, it's just mmost of them are inconsistent or just not good at playing together.

[Bloodangel26]

i disagree, talentwise the bears match up with just about everyone. their quarterback is the terribly inconsistent one. he either plays great or terrible, if he would just have good games and not terrible games they might be undefeated.

[Fuggle]

Vick is even more inconsistent than grossman.
He's on track to be the first QB to break 1000 rushing yards in a season though.
He had 150 last week and still lost lol.

[A.D.]

Good old NFL. All the team-switching, all the 'my division is harder than yours' arguements..

My Seahawks aren't doing too hot this season, 7-4 after an ugly win vs Packers of all teams, and the just lost to the 49'ers. I'm a fan to the end though, and as soon as Hasselbeck and Alexander get back into their rhythm I think we could be playoff contenders.

[Bloodangel26]

Vick is even more inconsistent than grossman.
He's on track to be the first QB to break 1000 rushing yards in a season though.
He had 150 last week and still lost lol.

its more his receivers than him. they cant catch period. was expecting better out of former buckeye michael jenkins...

[hellsing293]

Im Disapointed in those Chigao Bears.. Im not ragenig them or anything, but I completly had my money set on the Bears winning, stupid PATS, stupid GROSSMAN. I mean there supposibly the "Best" NFC team, so why didnt they win? It just irrates me that the stupid pats won.

maybe because the AFC is way better than the NFC. so a 9-1 NFC team can't stack up against a 7-3 AFC team. and, the pats not too long ago won 3 superbowls in 4 years and have one of the best quartebacks if not the best and a future hall of famer. Patriots would have kicked the bears ass even more if the bears didn't get two lucky ass interceptions.

and AFC has won 7 out of the last 9 superbowls btw to show how much better the AFC is. And in inter-conference play the AFC destroys the NFC in the win/loss record.

[ArrogantlyIgnorant]

maybe because the AFC is way better than the NFC. so a 9-1 NFC team can't stack up against a 7-3 AFC team. and, the pats not too long ago won 3 superbowls in 4 years and have one of the best quartebacks if not the best and a future hall of famer. Patriots would have kicked the bears ass even more if the bears didn't get two lucky ass interceptions.

and AFC has won 7 out of the last 9 superbowls btw to show how much better the AFC is. And in inter-conference play the AFC destroys the NFC in the win/loss record.

the score of the patriots game should have been much higher heavily favored towards the patriots. the bears are in a class of their own in the nfc. unfortunatley for them the better teams in the afc are in a much higher class than the bears

[Fuggle]

I woudln't call Brady the best QB of all time, not even close.

[PoTatoes]

saying Brady is the best QB of all time is like saying George Bush is a great president

[hellsing293]

I woudln't call Brady the best QB of all time, not even close.

i meant currently in the nfl

but also, he is the winningest quarterback of all time just for a little fun fact