Posts: 145
Threads: 31
Joined: Aug 2005
Reputation:
0
I've seen purists go as far as saying No torches, Ravens, and Forts as well..
Posts: 50
Threads: 3
Joined: Feb 2008
Reputation:
0
u bet ur sweet ass thats dumb lol we're definetely not going that far dw all that will be allowed but i think no tapping against barbs or druids thats all
I-laucht-I
Posts: 4,052
Threads: 275
Joined: Aug 2005
Reputation:
0
I just stopped by to look, and I'm wondering why no tap is allowed? When someone is building their melee character, the biggest thoughts in their head is life and retaining life. A character may rely heavily on that life tap/leach in duels to gain the upper hand.
I think everything should be allowed except spells and bows. Basically any range attack is bad.
Posts: 50
Threads: 3
Joined: Feb 2008
Reputation:
0
lol man tap is allowed but only on others chars that use tap things aswell
I-laucht-I
Posts: 646
Threads: 38
Joined: Nov 2006
Reputation:
0
O.K. Tap the forum guy is not BM and hence allowed =) Only gear that is really not GM is Grief and ethereal Fort.
Posts: 71
Threads: 2
Joined: Jan 2008
Reputation:
0
03-17-2008, 03:38 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-17-2008, 03:38 PM by dLihc.)
so are you guys just gunna keep asking questions? where are the god damn melee chars.
I've seen purists go as far as saying No torches, Ravens, and Forts as well..
ive seen ppl say no death and andy or anything causeing ele dmg but yes iso more melee chars
Zealot / Cest / *dLihc2 / dLihc
Zealer / Zeal-Z / *buttafucco / laucht
Conc Barb / SMACKaBITCH / *blizcanblome3 /BewareThePhoenix
3 more at 8 i will put in some more detailed rules but thanks for all the info guys
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Brace Yourself
Posts: 1,931
Threads: 140
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation:
0
why exactly is Eth fort bm?
You said so much without ever parting your lips.
Posts: 71
Threads: 2
Joined: Jan 2008
Reputation:
0
Tap Wrote:why exactly is Eth fort bm?
it shouldnt be but its kinda gay since adds mass dmg life and it would add way to much def so... yea its not allwed eth prudence is enuff
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Brace Yourself
Posts: 50
Threads: 3
Joined: Feb 2008
Reputation:
0
kk good we know the rules now all we need r the chars and oh Cest my new zealer now has eth prudence is that ok?
I-laucht-I
Posts: 71
Threads: 2
Joined: Jan 2008
Reputation:
0
as of now imma allow eth fort and eth prudence unless there is mass complaints, if they wanna give up the dr for the def thats fine...
Zealot / Cest / *dLihc2 / dLihc
Zealer / Zeal-factor / *buttafucco / laucht
Conc Barb / SMACKaBITCH / *blizcanblome3 /BewareThePhoenix
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Brace Yourself
Posts: 50
Threads: 3
Joined: Feb 2008
Reputation:
0
yay ty Cest oi is high defence like over 60k better than max dr? or does dr when it gets to 50% like double?
I-laucht-I
Posts: 71
Threads: 2
Joined: Jan 2008
Reputation:
0
03-18-2008, 03:54 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-18-2008, 03:54 PM by dLihc.)
nick i have no idea what your asking... but i think dr > 60k def yes
also... only way to get max dr with out a levi or shaft would be ss and if your using eth fort then other person can use exile so no complaining (imo tap>60kdef yes)
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Brace Yourself
Posts: 2
Threads: 0
Joined: Mar 2008
Reputation:
0
count me in
kpa2/Socialism or last-try/paranoidAndroid
simple rules imo: no tap vs non-tap chars(conc/fury, etc)
no eth breakables(e fort/pul'd e temp's or w/e you can think of)
say go, no potting, no angling, and other self-explanatory gm dueling rules apply ofc
death is not considered bm on ladder
Posts: 50
Threads: 3
Joined: Feb 2008
Reputation:
0
let me guess its alma negra isnt it socialism ^^? lol
I-laucht-I
Posts: 71
Threads: 2
Joined: Jan 2008
Reputation:
0
Zealot / Cest / *dLihc2 / dLihc
Zealer / Zeal-factor / *buttafucco / laucht
Conc Barb / SMACKaBITCH / *blizcanblome3 /BewareThePhoenix
kpa2/Socialism or last-try/paranoidAndroid
got 4 iso 8 =P
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Brace Yourself